Skip to main content

Abigail Heyman’s Groundbreaking Images of Women’s Lives (from The New Yorker)

Abigail Heyman’s Groundbreaking Images of Women’s Lives


“Houma Teenage Beauty Contest,” 1971.
Photographs by Abigail Heyman
In a two-page spread featured early on in “Growing up Female,” a photography book by Abigail Heyman, from 1974, two black-and-white pictures are laid out side by side. The left-hand photo shows a reflection of a little girl, from the shoulders up, gazing at herself in a bathroom mirror. The child, who is perhaps four or five, with dark, wide-set eyes and a pixie haircut, is separated from her likeness by a counter, whose white-tiled expanse is littered with a variety of beauty products: perfume bottles, creams, and soaps. These quotidian markers of feminine routine are accompanied by an element of fantasy; gazing at herself, the little girl stretches a slinky into a makeshift tiara atop her head. Seemingly mesmerized by her own image, she is captured at the innocent early stages of preoccupation with womanly self-presentation and self-making. On the spread’s right-hand side, meanwhile, is a self-portrait of Heyman in a mirror, though it is cut off not at the shoulders but at the neck—a composition more evocative of a decapitated head than of a classical bust. In the photo, Heyman is in her early thirties, and her face, under a halo of messy hair, wears a worried expression. Like her young counterpart, she is separated from her image by beauty products, but, here, they read less as tools of pleasurable transformation and more as objects that split a woman from her self, a divide echoed by an ugly crack that runs the length of the wall on which the mirror hangs. There is no sense of wonder here, only a drab reality, thick with dread. On the page, above the picture of the little girl, there is a handwritten quote: “My aunt used to say, ‘You’re a pretty girl. You’ll do well.’ ” Set next to Heyman’s bleak self-portrait, this sentence seems less like a reassuring truism and more like a witch’s curse.

“Ashley in Mirror,” 1973.

“Self-Portrait,” 1971.
Fantasy and reality, joy and oppression, hope and difficulty: the two images present contrasting but complementary angles from which to look at the everyday business of being a woman, which Heyman sought to document in all its complexity. “Growing up Female” was a hit when it was published, selling more than thirty-five thousand copies and serving as a de-facto companion piece to one of the bibles of American second-wave feminism, “Our Bodies, Ourselves,” from 1970, an instructional guide whose direct, unembarrassed approach to women’s health and sexuality—and women’s right to make decisions regarding their bodies—was positively revolutionary. Although Heyman’s book was a collection of fine-art photographs, it, too, aimed to provide women with a rousing reaffirmation of their own corporeal and emotional experiences, many of which had historically been hidden or diminished. “Heyman’s work is the perfect illustration of ‘the personal is political,’ ” the Paris-based photo historian and curator Clara Bouveresse told me, when I spoke to her recently on the phone. “It’s like reading a private and intimate diary, but its feminist issues have a collective dimension.”

“Indian Teenager,” 1971.

“Football Player,” 1972.

“Black Girl-White Doll,” 1972.
Bouveresse, who, earlier this year, curated a historical show of women in the seventies who photographed other women for the Arles photo festival, in which Heyman’s work was included, encountered “Growing up Female” by chance. She was doing research at the Mana Contemporary art center in New Jersey, which houses many photographic archives, when she came upon a box that contained Heyman’s work. The photographer, who died in 2013, at the age of seventy, never replicated the initial success of “Growing up Female.” Between 1974 and 1981, she was part of the prestigious photographers’ co-operative Magnum, but after she left it, and with feminist photography losing its cultural urgency as the eighties drew to an end, her work gradually sank into obscurity. Bouveresse, however, was struck by the force of the pictures she encountered, and by their still-fresh depiction of women’s lives, caught between self-expression and the circumscribed, structurally determined roles they are often, even today, relegated to. She was also impressed by the arresting combination of written text and images that make up the book. Some of the included utterances were the photographer’s own, and some were solicited from her friends and acquaintances. According to Bouveresse, this blurriness of authorship was intentional—making a particular personal experience into one that many women could identify with and claim, to greater collective impact.

A spread from “Growing Up Female.”

At left, “Factory Lunch,” 1973; at right, “August 26, Man-Children,” 1971.

”Abortion,” 1972.
Heyman’s images are specific to a distinct place and time—the America of the late sixties and early seventies, roiled by the feminist revolution and other protest movements, yet caught in the grip of earlier, more conservative ideologies. In other ways, however, these humanistic photos still feel relevant to our time. In several images, each taken in a different location and context, a woman is seen with her legs spread open. A stripper, her head and face obscured and her genitalia agape, performs a dance for a row of silent, gazing men; a new mother, her legs tented wide under surgical fabric, gives birth. (“At first I didn’t want my husband in the delivery room because I didn’t want him to see me that exposed. And I was afraid he would never want to make love with me again,” the accompanying text says.) Heyman herself is represented, too: “Nothing ever made me feel more like a sex object than going through an abortion alone,” she writes, the text hovering above an image of the dark triangle of her own legs, between which a doctor stands, performing the newly legal procedure.

“Confused Army,” 1971.

“Lingerie Shop,” 1972.

“Stripper,” 1971.
Women, Heyman showed, are always at risk of being seen as an abstraction—something less than fully human. In such a context, photography itself becomes a feminist act. In the act of composing these images, some of which dealt with private, taboo moments that had rarely, if ever, figured in the world of fine photography, Heyman reclaimed not just her own humanity but that of her subjects’ as well. In one image, a woman lies on her back, naked from the waist down, save for her socks, interacting genially with a group of fellow-women, who crowd encouragingly around her. “In a woman’s gynecological self-help group I got to know my body—and myself—better,” the text on the page opposite the photo reads. “Have you ever looked at your own cervix?” If a woman is exposed here, it is peaceably, unashamedly, painlessly, for her own education and that of other women. Looking at this image, it occurred to me that the book’s title might have meaning beyond the merely biological. To grow up female is not just to develop in a woman’s body over time but also to emerge into a greater, less embarrassed, less hidden, and more present understanding of what being a woman means, as complicated and contradictory as that meaning might be.

“Self-Help Demo,” 1972.
  • Naomi Fry is a staff writer at The New Yorker.
    Read more »

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Article from "The New York Times" Madagascar and Vanila plantations Photographs and Text by FINBARR O’REILLY AUG. 29, 2018

 Comment:  I once found a bag near a shopping Mall in Paris ....  It looked like a girl owned it because it was full of makeup bits and pieces and there were a lot of cards in it , one of which belonged to a buisness school and this had her name on it.  The student was from Madagascar and i was sighing to myself when i called the school and the receptionist wasnt helpful in finding the person i was looking for.  I went to the consolate or Embassy one morning , spending money on a Taxi in order to give the bag to a safe person working there.  The consolate reminded me of  consolates or embassies representing very poor countries ...   .... where is  all the money and wealth going ? SAMBAVA, Madagascar — Bright moonlight reflected off broad banana leaves, but it was still hard to see the blue twine laced through the undergrowth, a tripwire meant to send the unwary tumbling to the ground. “This is the way the thieves come,” sai...

My mother's family life in Banglore as children (1930's onwards .... and before the Partitian

Life and opinions of Jahan Namazie/Azim Ali ....  written in the summer of 2018 They had this theory that children being small didn't need much food. The choicest food was given to the men, as they were the bread winners so they needed to eat well. The dastarkhan was laid with all the best dishes. The men were served first while the women and children waited patiently till the men finished eating and the leftovers the women and rest of the family ate. Lucky for us we did not practice this in our house. My mother believed men and women were equal and deserved the same opportunities. She made my brothers do house work as well as the girls which was shocking as men had to be waited hand and foot. Men never went into the kitchen or took care of the children. My father had broken the rules, he did the cooking and took care of the children. Every one made fun of him, but he had an excuse as my mother was disabled due to her arthritis and co...