Skip to main content

'Sinicisation' of Muslims in Xinjiang

 Comment


I recently read an article in a magazine called Geo about the Dong people and a woman among them who had four children instead of the two children permitted her .  She is a poor worker in a village and her husband is a farmer.  She said that the reason for wanting four children was because she was trying to have a son , but also because she didnt know how to read and write and wanted her children in the family to be educated .... I thought if she had had an education to begin with she wouldnt want four children in the first place .... what about controlling the birth rate rather than religious views . It is unacceptable to pressure muslims , it reminds me of the Rohinga  and what happened there ....  how about solving the real issues ie like teaching  birth controle  to the poor and uneducated ...... if you let the population grow further , there will be nothing left to eat for the masses and only the rich will benefit from that situation !




China’s pitiless war on Muslim Uighurs poses a dilemma for the west

Europe seeks a ‘golden era’ of trade and investment with a country that is holding a million people in ‘re-education’ camps
Police patrol a Uighur neighbourhood in Urumqi, the capital of Xinjiang.
 Police patrol a Uighur neighbourhood in Urumqi, the capital of Xinjiang. Photograph: Tom Phillips for the Guardian

China is facing mounting international criticism over its systematic repression of Muslim Uighurs in western Xinjiang province, where an estimated 1 million people have been detained in “re-education” camps and subjected to prolonged physical and psychological abuse.
But Chinese leaders remain defiant, telling the UN and human rights activists last week, in effect, to mind their own business. The stand-off highlights one of the most challenging 21st century dilemmas for western democracies: how to sustain the pretence that an increasingly totalitarian China is a “normal” country with which they can do business.



The crackdown on the Uighurs, who make up about 11 million of Xinjiang’s 24 million inhabitants, has intensified since Xi Jinping became Communist party leader in 2012 and president in 2013. Xi claims the campaign is necessary to defeat Islamist terrorism and the “ideological virus” of separatism, despite anecdotal evidence that it is having the opposite effect.
Uighurs say the harsh measures, effectively criminalising an entire ethnic group, are intended to erase their identity, religion, culture and language while assuring the party’s ascendancy. Hundreds of thousands – exact figures are unobtainable – have been sent to the camps, where they are indoctrinated in party dogma, forced to learn Mandarin, and ordered to correct their thinking through self-criticism.
Uncounted thousands more are held in prison, while the remainder of the population is subject to an Orwellian surveillance system comprising cameras placed in Uighur homes and neighbourhoods, networks of local snoopers, biometric data collection, and voice and face recognition technologies. As in Stalin’s Russia, children are encouraged to inform on their parents. Winston Smith of George Orwell’s 1984 would have recognised Xi’s Xinjiang.




UN human rights panel challenged China last month over “credible reports” that up to 3 million ethnic Uighurs had been subjected to detention or forced re-education. Xinjiang, it was claimed, had become “a massive internment camp”.
Chinese officials responded with a variation on Vladimir Putin’s “Skripal defence”, in which truth is fungible, or fluid. China’s policy towards minorities promoted unity and harmony, said Hu Lianhe, a senior cadre: “There is no such thing as re-education centres.” Not only were reports of repression in Xinjiang incorrect, the events complained ofhad never actually happened.
When Michelle Bachelet, the newly appointed UN human rights chief and former president of Chile, proposed last week that international monitors be allowed into Xinjiang, Beijing accused her of listening to “one-sided information” and demanded the UN respect China’s sovereignty. In other words, butt out.
Telling the UN to get lost is one thing. Telling the Americans to do so is another. Following pressure from Congress, the US confirmed last week that it was considering sanctions on named Chinese companies and officials, including a Xi loyalist, Chen Quanguo, the party’s Xinjiang chief who transferred to the province after a career of repression in Tibet.


Theresa May and her husband Philip visiting Shanghai as part of a trade mission to China in February.
Pinterest
 Theresa May and her husband Philip visiting Shanghai as part of a trade mission to China in February. Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/PA

Beijing was taken by surprise. Donald Trump, the US president, after all, has shown scant interest in human rights abuses, and has praised Xi as a strong leader. But this was no sudden change of heart. The threat originated in what is becoming known as Washington’s parallel government, where senior officials routinely bypass the president.
Human Rights Watch added to the chorus of condemnation last week. Its new report on Xinjiang, based on detailed interviews with former detainees and their relatives, concluded that China was daily violating fundamental rights to freedom of expression, religion and privacy and breaking international law on discrimination against minorities. “Those detained have been denied due process rights and suffered torture and other ill-treatment ... The human rights violations in Xinjiang today are of a scope and scale not seen in China since the 1966-76 Cultural Revolution,” the organisation said.
The gathering furore over Xinjiang, and China’s flat rejection of international concerns, is likely to draw attention to other aspects of what Chinese liberals and western analysts say is a broader regression into Mao-era totalitarianism under Xi.
What is happening in Xinjiang mirrors China’s behaviour in Tibet, where Buddhist pro-independence forces have suffered brutal repression since the Chinese occupation began in 1949. The fact they have still not been crushed suggests there is hope for the Uighurs.
Xi’s success in abolishing term limits and establishing himself, de facto, as unelected “paramount leader” for life, his aggressive stance over the South China Sea, Taiwan and Hong Kong, his party purges, and his nationwide curbs on religious freedoms, free speech and independent media all add up to a wider challenge to western double standards. European countries seek a “golden era” of trade, investment and new markets, exemplified by Theresa May’s Beijing visit in February. At the same time, their most cherished beliefs and values, long enshrined in international law, are being shredded by a regime that treats their opinions with disdain.
In this sense, Xinjiang is a test case. So far China has avoided any significant political costs. Its UN security council veto protects it from meaningful censure. But the western democracies are not without leverage and influence, from the use of economic sanctions to political and moral pressure applied across a range of international platforms. If the abuses suffered by Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar require investigation by an international criminal tribunal, as the UN has suggested, then so too does Beijing’s pitiless war on the Uighurs. China’s slide into totalitarianism is accelerating. But who among western leaders will admit that the price of doing business is too high?





'Sinicisation' of Muslims in Xinjiang must go on, says Chinese official

Official warns of ‘infiltration of religious extremism’ amid crackdown on region’s large Muslim population
A Muslim Uighur woman in Xinjiang passes a propaganda poster celebrating the ‘China Dream’ of president Xi Jinping.
 A Muslim Uighur woman in Xinjiang passes a propaganda poster celebrating the ‘China Dream’ of president Xi Jinping. Photograph: Tom Phillips for the Guardian

The “sinicisation” of religion in China’s troubled north-western region of Xinjiang must be upheld to promote ethnic solidarity and religious harmony, a senior Communist party official has said.
China’s state-run Xinhua news agency quoted You Quan, the head of the “united front work department”, which oversees ethnic and religious affairs, while on a visit this week to Xinjiang, home to a large Muslim population.
“The party’s leadership over religious work must be upheld,” You said, adding that “the infiltration of religious extremism must be guarded against”.




Sinicisation refers to non-Chinese societies being forced to conform to Chinese culture, particularly that of the ethnic Han majority. This includes dress code, religion, culture, politics and language.
The Guardian has reported on how an estimated one million Muslims are being held in brutal re-education camps in Xinjiang. This week Xinjiang retroactively legitimised the use of the camps.
The camps are part of China’s “strike hard” campaign that is alleged to use extrajudicial detentions, surveillance, political indoctrination or “re-education”, torture and abuse in the name of rooting out extremism.
Mass detentions and strict surveillance of ethnic Uighurs and other Muslims in Xinjiang have provoked international criticism, with the United Statesconsidering sanctions against officials and companies linked to allegations of human rights abuses. The UN has called on China to shut down the camps.




China says Xinjiang faces a threat from Islamist militants and separatists, and has rejected all accusations of mistreatment in an area where there has been deadly unrest in recent years between Uighurs and Han Chinese.
You is a member of the influential secretariat of the party’s central committee.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Article from "The New York Times" Madagascar and Vanila plantations Photographs and Text by FINBARR O’REILLY AUG. 29, 2018

 Comment:  I once found a bag near a shopping Mall in Paris ....  It looked like a girl owned it because it was full of makeup bits and pieces and there were a lot of cards in it , one of which belonged to a buisness school and this had her name on it.  The student was from Madagascar and i was sighing to myself when i called the school and the receptionist wasnt helpful in finding the person i was looking for.  I went to the consolate or Embassy one morning , spending money on a Taxi in order to give the bag to a safe person working there.  The consolate reminded me of  consolates or embassies representing very poor countries ...   .... where is  all the money and wealth going ? SAMBAVA, Madagascar — Bright moonlight reflected off broad banana leaves, but it was still hard to see the blue twine laced through the undergrowth, a tripwire meant to send the unwary tumbling to the ground. “This is the way the thieves come,” sai...

LA Republica : A Verona lo street artist Cibo combatte il fascismo e il razzismo con i murales

arti visive street & urban art A Verona lo street artist Cibo combatte il fascismo e il razzismo con i murales       By   Valentina Poli  - 31 luglio 2018 QUANDO L’ARTE PUÒ DAVVERO FARE LA DIFFERENZA NELLE NOSTRE CITTÀ: CIBO È UNO STREET ARTIST VERONESE, CLASSE 1982, CHE CON IL SUO LAVORO PROVA A CANCELLARE LE SCRITTE E I SIMBOLI D’ODIO CHE AFFOLLANO I MURI COPRENDOLE CON FRAGOLE, ANGURIE, MUFFIN E ALTRE COSE DA MANGIARE. LA SUA STORIA Lavoro dello street artist Cibo “Non lasciare spazio all’odio”  o  “No al fascismo. Sì alla cultura”  e ancora  “Se ci metto la faccia è perché ho la speranza che altri mi seguano nel rendere le città libere dall’odio e dai fascismi, qualsiasi bandiera portino oggi. Scendete in strada e non abbiate paura! La cultura e l’amore vincerà sempre su queste persone insipide!”.  Queste sono alcune frasi che si possono leggere sul profilo Facebook di  Pier Paolo Spinazzè , in ...

Abigail Heyman’s Groundbreaking Images of Women’s Lives (from The New Yorker)

Photo Booth Abigail Heyman’s Groundbreaking Images of Women’s Lives By Naomi Fry November 1, 2019 “Houma Teenage Beauty Contest,” 1971. Photographs by Abigail Heyman In a two-page spread featured early on in “ Growing up Female ,” a photography book by Abigail Heyman, from 1974, two black-and-white pictures are laid out side by side. The left-hand photo shows a reflection of a little girl, from the shoulders up, gazing at herself in a bathroom mirror. The child, who is perhaps four or five, with dark, wide-set eyes and a pixie haircut, is separated from her likeness by a counter, whose white-tiled expanse is littered with a variety of beauty products: perfume bottles, creams, and soaps. These quotidian markers of feminine routine are accompanied by an element of fantasy; gazing at herself, the little girl stretches a slinky into a makeshift tiara atop her head. Seemingly mesmerized by her own image, she is captured at the innoce...