Skip to main content

Unions and what they do in the US

.
By Meagan Day and Bhaskar Sunkara
First of all: We should all be celebrating that last night voters in Missouri rejected a right-to-work law by a 2-to-1 margin.
Why? The average person in the United States has essentially zero power in society. That’s why millions have organized into unions over the years. But the slow decline of unionism in the United States should concern you even if you’re not in one.
Unions improve wagesbenefits and working conditions for their members. But it’s not just to members’ advantage. Collective bargaining affects pay standards across entire industries, meaning even nonunion workers benefit. Unions also secure legislation that protects all workers, from workplace safety guidelines to a guaranteed weekend. And they reduce gender and racial wage gaps across industries, which contributes to broader equality in society.
Owing largely to a sustained political assault on unions, their memberships have been declining since the mid-20th century — a trend that, not coincidentally, maps neatly onto rising economic inequality and falling wages. The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees is the latest blow to unions, effectively instituting a nationwide “right-to-work” regime for public-sector unions. Right to work forces unions to represent even those who don’t pay dues or claim membership, discouraging workers from joining and contributing. In short, it kills unions by attrition.
And that’s the goal. A web of right-wing corporate elites, think tanks and foundations bankrolls union-busting campaigns like the one that led to Janus. The mission of the Bradley Foundation, which has pumped millions of dollars into right-to-work advocacy for 15 years, includes supporting “organizations and projects that reduce the size and power of public sector unions.” Internal documents obtained by The Guardian show that one foundation supported by the anti-union Koch brothers expressly endeavors to “cause public-sector unions to experience 5 to 20% declines in membership, costing hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars in dues money.”
In the wake of Janus, the labor movement faces a choice: It can passively watch members drift away, or it can return to its roots, renewing a commitment to internal democracy, face-to-face organizing and bold strike action — in other words, do the things to win concessions and actually give people a sense of belonging and purpose in the movement. And American workers should cheer labor on when they take this course — for example, by supporting the ongoing wave of teachers’ strikes — knowing that the fates of union and nonunion workers are inextricable.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Article from The Guardian: "The Super Rich: Six Things to Know "

    America's super rich: six things to know Our new series, Big Money , is investigating the social and political clout of the super-rich. Natalie Jones and Alastair Gee in San Francisco, California I s America an oligarchy? That was the conclusion of a 2014 study by two prominent US political scientists , who argued that the influence of economic elites and big business far outstrips that of ordinary citizens. In their view, America is less a bastion of representative democracy than a nation trammeled by the desires of the hyper-wealthy. Others have suggested that their vision is too bleak. But the outsize economic, social and political clout of the super-wealthy in America is beyond debate - and ripe for scrutiny. That’s why we’ve launched our newest series, Big Money. Radical inequality The three richest people in the US - Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, and Warren Buffet - own more than the bottom half of the country combined. ...

" Un Temps Pour Les Rêveurs Et Les Créateurs" A translation in French by Nathalie Diss; On Kindle in French

A Time For Dreamers Written by Nilofar Mehrin   Translated by Nathalie Diss 1998 Via Fiesolana , Florence ----------------------------------------   Je parlais avec William W. un ami   qui a enseigné dans une université américaine à Florence. Il était un concepteur de sites Web et avait créé de nombreux sites Web pour des artistes qu’il connaissait. Il avait vu mon studio et mes cartes1 et avait dit: «Pourquoi n'écrivez-vous pas une histoire pour aller avec vos cartes?»   J'ai toujours voulu écrire une telle histoire, mais j'ai fini par écrire un poème intitulé "là-bas » en angais.    Puis en 2009 j'ai fait une animation de quatre minute. Utilisant   mon poème et des images des peintures que j'avais faites, dans une sorte de collage   (avec l'aide de M. Khorramian et son assistant M. Hosseini en Tehran,     ils travaillaient pour la télévision iranienne). Plus tard, j'ai pensé a faire une tableaux de ...

Transavanguardia italiana

Transavanguardia italiana Da Wikipedia, l'enciclopedia libera. Jump to navigation Jump to search Francesco Clemente fotografato a San Francisco nel 1991 con il proprio Autoritratto La transavanguardia italiana è un movimento artistico italiano nato verso la seconda metà degli anni settanta del XX secolo su progetto del critico Achille Bonito Oliva (a cui si deve il neologismo stesso) sulla scia della crisi economica che caratterizzò questo decennio e che ridimensionò l' ottimismo produttivo e culturale dell' Italia . Questa crisi economica ebbe conseguenze anche sull'arte, dato che smorzò l'ottimismo sperimentale delle avanguardie [1] . Contestualizzata, a posteriori, come una delle correnti del postmodernismo , la transavanguardia, grazie alla natura anticipatoria [2] dei movimenti che hanno caratterizzato l'attraversamento dell' arte concettuale , ha continuato, in Italia, ad essere protagonista di ulterio...